Home | Business | Small Business
It looks very simple, doesn't it? "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." The Golden Rule appears so all-inclusive that it might be a solution for all human relations. Simply handle everyone the way you would appreciate being taken care of and everything will run wonderfully, yes? Just a second... It seems that something is off... Does your company's twenty-two year old hotshot account rep aim for the exact same benefits from their job that your forty-something accounting clerk wants? Is your technical staff aiming for similar goals and reimbursement as your secretary? Obviously, their needs and wants are very unique, though many business owners use a universal approach when rewarding their most important employees. After a large job is finished, everybody gets an identical thing, whether you buy them a meal or a gas card. Delivering the same thing to everyone is what's fair, right? But do you think it's truly fair for your most valuable staff? Hold On to Your Most Valuable Staff Startlingly few managers realize that the Pareto Principle lesson about their team indicates that 2 out of 10 of their team are producing 80% of your entire team's success. In addition, just about every management book talks about studies which compare the productivity of the most valuable workers to the not so skilled (yet still effective) workers. The difference between the extremes have been found to be as much as 100 to 1. The nearest these ratios ever seem to approach is about 4:1. But how much more does this extraordinary variance in value wind up costing? Let's say that your yearly salary for the company's least skilled staff member is $30,000, how much does it cost for your most valuable staff? Since a lot of the costs for an employee stay the same, those costs don't go up in relation to base salary. For the intent of this examination, let's use some worst-case figures, $60k. Assuming that your $30k employee generates $30k of value (otherwise they'd be gone, right?). If your most valuable employee is a mere four times more productive than the worst, they deliver far more value for how much more they cost. If you pays for more classes for your low-end people, costs immediately go up, but without any assurance that productivity will similarly go up. Consider, also, what part of your time is factored into the "cost" of this moderately competent employee? Probably none. Management costs are usually invisible, factored away as overhead. It certainly feels like you're being productive - trying your hardest to bring along the strugglers, hoping that they eventually rise above their shortcomings. Consider how much of your time is spent with either of these employees:
Article Source: ArticlesBusiness.net
Daiv Russell is a management consultant with Envision Engineering.
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
Not yet Rated
Web Counters